Editorial and testing standards
A trustworthy game library needs more than working buttons. These are the standards we use for rules, explanations, corrections, and product claims.
Rules and variants
Traditional games often have regional variants. We document the rules used by the implementation and avoid presenting one local convention as the only possible version. When a choice materially changes play—such as scoring, deck size, trump order, or a final-card restriction—the in-game guide should say so.
Original writing
Strategy guides are written for TableTurf rather than copied or lightly rewritten from another site. They connect rules to decisions, distinguish facts from recommendations, and link to playable examples. We do not publish empty keyword pages or create a separate article when one strong guide can answer the question better.
Functional review
Automated checks cover game engines, legal actions, rendering contracts, responsive layout, card detail, dark-table contrast, and shared controls. Manual walkthroughs cover the moments automation misses: whether a choice is understandable, whether the next action is visible, and whether a completed game ends cleanly.
Corrections
When a rule, label, or game response is found to be wrong, we correct both the implementation and any related guide. Material corrections update the review date on the relevant article. We do not silently change a rule merely to make an unfinished game easier to complete.
Advertising separation
Advertising is visually labelled and separated from navigation and game controls. An ad must not cover a playable component, masquerade as a game action, or create a misleading “download” or “continue” path.